AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Data dredging vs p hacking1/31/2024 Is not significant, and, I don’t want to be rude, but isn’t this p-hacking?” Recommend sequential analysis in your paperįor when effect sizes are uncertain, where researchers collect data, analyze theĭata, stop when a test is significant, or continue data collection when a test $P$-hacking is rather related to the actions of the analyst that are aimed at "making" the result statistically significant.Workshop on Sample Size Justification an early career researcher asked me: “You So "data mining bias" described above seems more related to accidentally finding spurious correlations in the data when doing exploratory analysis on big amounts of data. The term $p$-hacking is used in a science scenario, where a researcher switches his methodology, tools, or manipulates the data until achieving a "statistically significant" result that "proves" their hypothesis and is publishable. Seems like the term is used in a trading scenario, where finding spurious patterns in the data leads to bad investment decisions. Investors try to put weight on identifying patterns. This type of bias usually occurs during the research process when Results in investment strategies that are unsuccessful in the long To identify statistically significant patterns, which may come as a Investors to make the plays they make in the market.ĭata mining bias occurs when investors go through a dataset in order Is considered an “insidious threat” because it can sneak up on tradersĪnd analysts alike during the research processes that lead traders and Quick search gave me two references with definitionsĭata-mining bias refers to an assumption of importance a traderĪssigns to an occurrence in the market that actually was a result ofĬhance or unforeseen events. Honestly, I never saw the "data mining bias" term before.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |